Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2018; 9(9): 138-148
Published online Sep 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.138
Published online Sep 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.138
Patientnumber | Gender | Risser grade | Scoliosis type(No. ofpatients)[9] | Procedure(posterior spinalfusion/levels) | Upper thoracic scoliosis(pre-op/post-op;degrees); (% correction) | Main thoracic scoliosis(pre-op/post-op;degrees); (% correction) | Lumbar scoliosis (pre-op/post-op; degrees);(%correction) | Kyphosis (pre-op/post-op);(degrees) | Lordosis (pre-op/post-op);(degrees) | Coronal balance(pre-op/post-op);(cm) | Sagittal balance (pre-op/post-op); (cm) |
1 | F | 5 | 2A | PSF T2-T10 | 52/23 (56%) | 49/22 (55%) | - | 19/52 | 49/52 | 0/0 | -3.5/0 |
2 | F | 5 | 1B | PSF T3-T11 | - | 48/15 (69%) | 35/17 (51%- spontaneous correction) | 27/52 | 47/53 | 0.3/0 | -2.8/0 |
3 | M | 2 | 2A | PSF T2-L1 | 32/11 (66%) | 47/11 (77%) | - | 35/44 | 40/42 | 0.8/0 | -0.8/0 |
4 | F | 4 | 1A | PSF T2/T9 | - | 45/0 (100%) | - | 45/55 | 55/58 | 2.3/0 | -0.3/0 |
5 | M | 5 | 2A | PSF T2-T11 | 32/12 (62.5%) | 52/16 (69%) | 30/6 (80%-spontaneous correction) | 23/44 | 59/45 | 0.8/0 | -3.1/0 |
6 | F | 5 | 3C | PSF T2-L4 | - | 55/12 (78%) | 48/10 (79%) | 25/50 | 40/50 | 1.2/0 | -2.8/0 |
7 | F | 5 | 2B | PSF T3-T12 | 35/12 (66%) | 55/21 (62%) | 36/11 (69%-spontaneous correction) | 28/48 | 50/50 | 1/0 | -3.0/0 |
8 | M | 4 | 1A | PSF T2-T12 | - | 60/15 (75%) | 39/10 (74%-spontaneous correction) | 16/38 | 43/42 | 0/0 | 1.5/0 |
9 | F | 3 | 2A | PSF T3-T12 | 29/9 (69%) | 48/14 (71%) | 30/2 (93%-spontaneous correction) | 17/38 | 33/38 | 0.6/0 | -1.2/0 |
10 | F | 3 | 1A | PSF T2-T11 | - | 52/20 (61.5%) | 36/15 (58%-spontaneous correction) | 24/46 | 61/51 | 0/0 | -2.5/0 |
11 | M | 5 | 1B | PSF T2-T11 | - | 55/16 (71%) | 30/15 (50%-spontaneous correction) | 20/48 | 47/50 | 3.5/0 | 4.1/0 |
12 | F | 4 | 2A | PSF T3-T12 | 32/11 (66%) | 59/17 (71%) | 32/13 (59%-spontaneous correction) | 46/48 | 57/46 | 0.8/0.2 | -3.5/-1 |
13 | M | 4 | 1A | PSF T2-T11 | - | 52/15 (71%) | 30/15 (50%-spontaneous correction) | 20/47 | 48/46 | 3/0 | 3.5/0 |
14 | F | 5 | 2B | PSF T2-T11 | 42/15 (64.3%) | 60/25 (58.3%) | 40/14 (65%-spontaneous correction) | 31/48 | 46/47 | 1.2/0.5 | -2.3/0 |
15 | F | 4 | 2A | PSF T3-T12 | 39/14 (64%) | 69/23 (67%) | 37/14 (62%-spontaneous correction) | 31/47 | 45/50 | 0.5/0 | -0.5/0 |
16 | F | 3 | 2A | PSF T3-L2 | 22/8 (64%) | 59/20 (66%) | 28/9 (68%-spontaneous correction) | 56/54 | 54/53 | 2.5/0.3 | 2.2/0 |
Summary of data | 11 F; 5 M | Mean: 4.1 | Scoliosis type 1 (1); 2 (2); 3 (6); 4 (7) | 15 TH fusions; one TH/L fusion | Mean values: 35/12.7 (64%) | Mean values: 54/16 (70.4%) | Mean values: 35/11.6 (67%) | Mean values: 29/47.4 (63.4%) | Mean values: 48/48 no change | Mean values: 1.16/0.06 (95%) | Mean values: 2.35/0.06 (97.4%) |
- Citation: Tsirikos AI, Loughenbury PR. Single rod instrumentation in patients with scoliosis and co-morbidities: Indications and outcomes. World J Orthop 2018; 9(9): 138-148
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i9/138.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.138