Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2018; 9(7): 92-99
Published online Jul 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i7.92
Published online Jul 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i7.92
Exchange nailing | Dynamization | EN vs dynam | |||
Union/total reported | Significant vs total union rate | Union/total reported | Significant vs total union rate | P-values | |
No. of patients | 556/644 | - | 84/131 | - | P < 0.0001 |
Reamed vs unreamed | |||||
Reamed | 516/598 | NS | NA | - | - |
Unreamed | 19/22 | NS | NA | - | - |
Static vs dynamic | |||||
Dynamic | 97/115 | NS | NA | - | - |
Static | 173/210 | NS | NA | - | - |
No locking (/Kuntschner) | 35/36 | NS | NA | - | - |
Delayed union | 25/27 | NS | 45/55 | P = 0.0228 | P = 0.3199 |
Nonunion (+type) | 491/567 | NS | 24/57 | P = 0.0063 | P < 0.0001 |
Elephant | 6/7 | NS | 0/0 | - | - |
Horse | 12/18 | P = 0.0310 | 0/0 | - | - |
Oligotrophic | 22/22 | NS | 16/22 | NS | P = 0.0211 |
Hypotrophic | 9/13 | NS | 0/0 | - | - |
Atrophic | 80/99 | NS | 5/12 | NS | P = 0.0064 |
Hypertrophic | 72/83 | NS | 9/11 | NS | NS |
Bone grafting used | |||||
Yes | 98/106 | NS | 2/2 | NS | NS |
No | 165/190 | NS | 32/53 | NS | P < 0.0001 |
Infected | 19/30 | P = 0.0019 | 0/0 | - | - |
Patients lost to follow-up | 28 | - | 4 | - | - |
Major complications following surgery | 45 | - | 13 | - | NS |
Patients achieving union after additional surgery vs surgeries attempted | 82/92 | - | 34/34 | - | - |
- Citation: Vaughn JE, Shah RV, Samman T, Stirton J, Liu J, Ebraheim NA. Systematic review of dynamization vs exchange nailing for delayed/non-union femoral fractures. World J Orthop 2018; 9(7): 92-99
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i7/92.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i7.92