Clinical Practice Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2018; 9(3): 41-49
Published online Mar 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41
Table 2 Anchor-based methods for minimum clinically important difference determination of the PROMIS PF CAT, HOOS JR and KOOS JR
InstrumentnNo change (SD)nMean change (SD)ROC cut-off
3-mo from baseline follow-up
PF CAT546.95 (6.70)887.60 (4.98)1.97
HOOS JR622.81 (10.10)2414.81 (12.45)43.36
KOOS JR1410.49 (10.00)3714.51 (9.76)7.24
> 3-mo from baseline follow-up
PF CAT3666.02 (5.40)5777.29 (7.31)3.44
HOOS JR4814.34 (15.23)11018.49 (12.53)8.07
KOOS JR9612.71 (12.62)15114.82 (12.56)8.16
6-mo from baseline follow-up
PF CAT214.36 (4.32)348.41 (6.12)3.52
HOOS JR66.62 (5.87)519.68 (18.65)7.45
KOOS JR1213.49 (11.07)1418.85 (12.82)6.12
> 6-mo from baseline follow-up
PF CAT1926.44 (5.83)4217.69 (6.75)8.18
HOOS JR7612.58 (11.61)5717.57 (13.92)6.33
KOOS JR8112.45 (10.77)6415.47 (13.38)2.21

  • Citation: Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL. Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthop 2018; 9(3): 41-49
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i3/41.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41