Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2018; 9(3): 14-23
Published online Mar 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14
Published online Mar 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14
Treatment | Implants (positions) | Superior implant ending point | Range of motion (°) | Motion increase (°) | % 3 implant motion |
Intact | - | -1 | 0.66 | - | - |
Inline | 3 (S, M, I) | Mid-ala | 0.45 | Reference configuration | |
Inline | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-ala | 0.5 | 0.05 | 11 |
Inline | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-ala | 0.47 | 0.02 | 4 |
Inline | 2 (-, M, I) | -1 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 18 |
Inline | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-ala | 0.58 | 0.13 | 29 |
Inline | 1 (-, M, -) | -1 | 0.65 | 0.2 | 44 |
Inline | 1 (-, -, I) | -1 | 0.69 | 0.24 | 53 |
Inline | 3 (S, M, I) | Mid-sacrum | 0.41 | Reference configuration | |
Inline | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-sacrum | 0.45 | 0.04 | 10 |
Inline | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-sacrum | 0.43 | 0.02 | 5 |
Inline | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-sacrum | 0.58 | 0.17 | 41 |
Transarticular | 3 (S, M, I) | Mid-ala | 0.41 | Reference configuration | |
Transarticular | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-ala | 0.45 | 0.04 | 10 |
Transarticular | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-ala | 0.42 | 0.01 | 2 |
Transarticular | 2 (-, M, I) | -1 | 0.47 | 0.06 | 15 |
Transarticular | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-ala | 0.58 | 0.17 | 41 |
Transarticular | 1 (-, M, -) | -1 | 0.6 | 0.19 | 46 |
Transarticular | 1 (-, -, I) | -1 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 51 |
Transarticular | 3 (S, M, I) | Mid-sacrum | 0.38 | Reference configuration | |
Transarticular | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-sacrum | 0.41 | 0.03 | 8 |
Transarticular | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-sacrum | 0.39 | 0.01 | 3 |
Transarticular | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-sacrum | 0.58 | 0.2 | 53 |
Treatment | Implants (positions) | Superior implant ending point | % 3 Implant motion | Implants (positions) | Median (%) [range] |
Inline | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-ala | 4 | 2 (S, -, I) | 3.5% (2-5) |
Inline | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-sacrum | 5 | ||
Transarticular | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-ala | 2 | ||
Transarticular | 2 (S, -, I) | Mid-sacrum | 3 | ||
Inline | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-ala | 11 | 2 (S, M, -) | 10% (8-11) |
Inline | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-sacrum | 10 | ||
Transarticular | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-ala | 10 | ||
Transarticular | 2 (S, M, -) | Mid-sacrum | 8 | ||
Inline | 2 (-, M, I) | -1 | 18 | 2 (-, M, I) | 16.5% (15-18) |
Transarticular | 2 (-, M, I) | -1 | 15 | ||
Inline | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-ala | 29 | 1 (S, -, -) | 41% (29-53) |
Inline | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-sacrum | 41 | ||
Transarticular | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-ala | 41 | ||
Transarticular | 1 (S, -, -) | Mid-sacrum | 53 | ||
Inline | 1 (-, M, -) | -1 | 44 | 1 (-, M, -) | 45% (44-46) |
Transarticular | 1 (-, M, -) | -1 | 46 | ||
Inline | 1 (-, -, I) | -1 | 53 | 1 (-, -, I) | 52% (51-53) |
Transarticular | 1 (-, -, I) | -1 | 51 |
- Citation: Lindsey DP, Kiapour A, Yerby SA, Goel VK. Sacroiliac joint stability: Finite element analysis of implant number, orientation, and superior implant length. World J Orthop 2018; 9(3): 14-23
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i3/14.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14