Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2017; 8(12): 956-963
Published online Dec 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.956
Table 1 Modified Coleman Methodology Score[6]
SectionNo. or factorScore
Part A: Only one score to be given for each section
1 Study size - number of patients
> 6010
41-607
20-404
< 20, not stated0
2 Mean follow up (mo)
> 245
12-242
< 12, not stated or unclear0
3 Number of different surgical procedures included in each reported outcome. More than one surgical technique may beassessed but separate outcomes should be reported
One surgical procedure10
More than one surgical procedure, but > 90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure7
Not stated, unclear, or < 90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure0
4 Type of study
Randomized controlled trial15
Prospective cohort study10
Retrospective cohort study0
5 Diagnostic certainty (MRI)
In all5
In > 80%3
In < 80%0
6 Description of surgical procedure given
Adequate (technique stated and necessary details of that type of procedure given)5
Fair (technique only stated without elaboration)3
Inadequate, not stated, or unclear0
7 Description of postoperative rehabilitation
Well described (ROM, WB and sport)10
Not adequately described (2 items between ROM and WB and sport)5
Protocol not reported0
Part B: Scores may be given for each option in each of the three sections if applicable
1 Outcome criteria
Outcome measures clearly defined2
Timing of outcome assessment clearly stated (e.g., at best outcome after surgery or follow-up)2
Objective, subjective and imaging criteria6
2 items between objective, subjective and imaging criteria4
Objective or subjective or radiological criteria2
2 Procedure for assessing outcomes
Subjects recruited (results not taken from surgeons files)5
Investigator independent of surgeon4
Written assessment3
Completion of assessment by subjects themselves with minimal investigator assistance3
3 Description of subject selection process
Selection criteria reported and unbiased5
Recruitment rate reported
> 80% or5
< 80%3
Eligible subjects not included in the study satisfactorily accounted for, or 100% recruitment5