Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2017; 8(12): 946-955
Published online Dec 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.946
Table 3 Comparisons made between groups in primary TKA RCTs
PaperComparison
Chiu et al[18], 2001Cefuroxime-impregnated cement vs PBC
Vrabec et al[23], 2016Intravenous tobramycin vs AIBC with tobramycin
Chiu et al[19], 2002Cefuroxime-impregnated cement vs PBC
Lizaur-Utrilla et al[24], 2014Tibial fixation with either a cemented (Palacos with Gentamicin) vs cementless with screw augmentation (systemic antibiotics only)
Nilsson et al[25], 1999Vacuum mixed bone cement (Palacos–Gentamicin) vs hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses
Bercovy et al[26], 2012Hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses vs cemented (Refobacin) tibial components
Hinarejos et al[20], 2013Simplex P cement loaded with 0.5 g of erythromycin and three million units of colistin in 40 g of cement (Stryker) vs simplex cement without antibiotic
McQueen et al[22], 1987Cefuroxime in bone cement (1.5 g of cefuroxime powder was added to 40 g of CMW cement powder) vs systemic (1.5 g) cefuroxime
McQueen et al[21], 1990Cefuroxime in bone cement (1.5 g of cefuroxime powder was added to 40 g of CMW cement powder) vs systemic (1.5 g) cefuroxime