Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2017; 8(10): 777-784
Published online Oct 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.777
Published online Oct 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.777
Patient and operations (model) | Haemophilia therapy | Primary haemostatic outcome | Surgical outcome |
A | |||
TKR (cruciate retaining) | Cryo (AHF-20) → pdFVIII | Good | Good |
TKR (cruciate retaining) | pdFVIII | Good | Good |
Ankle arthroplasty | pdfVIII | Good | Good |
Ankle arthroplasty | pdFVIII | Good | Good |
Knee revision arthroplasty (reconstructive) | rFVIII | Fair | Good |
Knee revision arthroplasty (reconstructive) | rFVIII | Good | Good |
B | |||
Knee hemiarthroplasty (unicondylar) | pdFVIII | Good | Poor |
Revision arthroplasty (cruciate retaining) | pdFVIII → rFVIIa | Fair | Good |
- Citation: Danielson H, Lassila R, Ylinen P, Yrjönen T. Total joint replacement in inhibitor-positive haemophilia: Long-term outcome analysis in fifteen patients. World J Orthop 2017; 8(10): 777-784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v8/i10/777.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.777