Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2017; 8(10): 761-769
Published online Oct 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.761
Table 2 The best fitting and pain-DETECT questionnaire models showing the contribution of factors to post-total joint replacement, post-total hip replacement and post-total knee replacement satisfaction
Full/best fitting modelpain-DETECT questionnaire scores
Total joint replacement satisfaction2.207 + (-0.013∙PCS) + (0.189∙sex) + (-0.398∙TKR) + (0.016∙BMI) + (-0.027∙WOMAC function) + (-0.042∙WOMAC stiffness) + (-0.012∙past knee surgery) + (-0.056∙PDQ) + (-0.483∙highVAS) + (-0.380∙revision surgery) + (0.352∙severe pre-surgical radiographic OA) + (-0.066∙OTC) + (-0.113∙opioid) + (-0.010∙current smoker) + (-0.218∙stroke) + (0.051∙hypertension) + (0.062∙IBS) + (-0.055∙gout) + (-0.123∙depression)2.796 + (-0.142∙PDQ) + (-0.015∙age) + (0.382∙sex) + (0.004∙BMI)
Total hip replacement satisfaction2.985 + (0.014∙years since surgery) + (-0.018∙age) + (0.036∙BMI) + (-0.036∙WOMAC function) + (0.599∙past knee surgery) + (-0.018∙PDQ) + (-0.725∙high VAS) + (-0.723∙revision surgery) + (0.779∙severe pre-surgical radiographic OA) + (-0.248∙OTC) + (-0.119∙opioid) + (-0.429∙other medications for pain relief) + (-0.442∙current smoker) + (-0.014∙stroke) + (-0.514∙depression) + (-0.022∙cancer)4.788 + (-0.121∙PDQ) + (-0.038∙age) + (0.036∙sex) + (0.008∙BMI)
Total knee replacement satisfaction2.425 + (-0.018∙PCS) + (0.190∙sex) + (0.00045∙BMI) + (-0.015∙WOMAC function) + (-0.130∙WOMAC stiffness) + (-0.076∙PDQ) + (-0.313∙high VAS) + (0.009∙severe pre-surgical radiographic OA) + (-0.143∙stroke) + (0.072∙hypertension) + (0.334∙IBS) + (-0.120∙gout)1.072 + (-0.146∙PDQ) + (0.003∙age) + (0.467∙sex) + (0.011∙BMI)