Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2016; 7(9): 584-591
Published online Sep 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.584
Table 1 Demographic information of the studies included in this systematic review
Ref.Type of studyTotal patientsMales (%)Mean ageFracture typesMean follow-up timeOutcome criteria scoring
Abdel et al[14]Prospective623663Tibia15KSS
Bala et al[9]RetrospectivePTA: 3509PTA: 43N/ATibia/femurN/ACCI; Elixhauser
Cont: 257, 611Cont: 35
Benazzo et al[24]Prospective434764Tibia/femur/patella6KSS
Civinini et al[25]Retrospective253657Tibia8KSS
Deschamps et al[23]Retrospective784263Tibia/femur (includes malunions)4SOO
Lizaur-Utrilla et al[11]Prospective matched cohortPTA: 29 Cont: 5835PTA: 57.3 Cont: 59.2Tibia7KSS, SF-12, WOMAC
Lonner et al[17]Prospective305060Tibia/femur4KSS
Lunebourg et al[8]RetrospectivePTA: 33PTA: 55PTA: 69Tibia/femur11KSS, KOOS
Cont: 407Cont: 32Cont: 72
Massin et al[13]Retrospective401059Tibia/femur5IKS
Papadopoulos et al[22]Retrospective472165Femur (includes malunions)6KSS
Parratte et al[19]Retrospective744663Tibia/femur/patella (includes malunion)4KSS
Saleh et al[6]Retrospective152756Tibia6HSS, SF-36
Scott et al[16]Prospective matched cohortPTA: 31 Cont: 932666Tibia7Oxford knee, SF-12
Shearer et al[10]Retrospective476248Tibia/femur4KSS
Weiss et al[12]Prospective623663Tibia5KSS
Wu et al[26]Retrospective158058Tibia/femur3KSS