Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2016; 7(9): 527-538
Published online Sep 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.527
Published online Sep 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.527
Randomized arm | Patients | n | Randomization | 3-yr EFS |
Arm 1 | SR, Localized (good histologic response, < 200 mL + RT) | 856 | 6#VIDE + 1#VAI f/b 7#VAI vs 7#VAC | 78% vs 75% |
Arm 2 | HR, Localized (poor histologic response, ≥ 200 mL and RT alone) | --- | 6#VIDE + 1#VAI f/b 7# VAI vs BuMel (n = 281) | 45% (BuMel) |
Lung metastasis only | --- | 6#VIDE + 1#VAI f/b 7# VAI + WLI vs BuMel | --- | |
Arm 3 | Extrapulmonary metastasis | --- | 6#VIDE + 1#VAI f/b BuMel/TreoMel vs clinical trial | --- |
- Citation: Biswas B, Bakhshi S. Management of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: Current scenario and unmet need. World J Orthop 2016; 7(9): 527-538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i9/527.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.527