Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2016; 7(6): 392-400
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.392
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.392
Ref. | Year | Type of study | Graft type | Irradiation dose | No. of patients (at final follow-up/enrolled) | Male | Female | Average age (yr) | Follow-up length | Findings | Weaknesses |
Rihn et al[26] | 2006 | Retrospective | BPTB - allograft | 2.5 Mrad | 39 | 27 | 12 | 44 ± 8.4 | 4.2 yr | Significant difference between irradiated allograft and allograft with laxity, Lachman, and pivot shift clunk | Age difference in populations |
BPTB - autograft | None | 63 | 43 | 20 | 25.3 ± 9.3 | 4.6 yr | No significant difference on range of motion, effusion, IKDC, KT-1000 when adjusted for age, IKDC physical exam rating, and return to sport | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed | |||
Rappé et al[18] | 2007 | Cohort | Achilles - allograft | 2.0-2.5 Mrad | 33/45 | N/A | N/A | 26 (ranage 14-59) | 6 mo | Significantly more clincal failures in irradiated allograft vs non-irradiated allograft groups with failures occuring about 9 mo earlier in irradiated group (failure of graft = 5 mm or greater on KT-1000 compared to contralateral side, positive Lachman, or magnetic resonance imaging) | Large loss of follow-up in irradiated group |
Achilles - allograft | None | 42/45 | 27 (range 14-57) | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed | |||||||
Sun et al[22] | 2009 | Prospective, randomized | BPTB - allograft | 2.5 Mrad | 32/33 | 24 | 8 | 30.1 ± 6.1 | 31 mo (2% lost to follow-up) | Significant difference between irradiated allograft and autograft with greater laxity on KT-2000, side to side difference on KT-2000, pivot shift grade II or III, anterior drawer test grade II or III, and Lachman test grade II or III | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed |
BPTB - autograft | None | 33/33 | 24 | 9 | 29.7 ± 7.2 | No significant difference on overall IKDC, range of motion, Harner's vertical jump test, Daniel's one-leg hip test, subjective IKDC, Cincinnati knee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score | |||||
Sun et al[23] | 2009 | Prospective, randomized | BPTB - allograft | 2.5 Mrad | 32 | 24 | 8 | 30.1 ± 6.1 | 31 mo (1% lost to follow-up - treatment group not mentioned) | Significant difference between irradiated allograft, non-irradiated allograft, and autograft with greater laxity on KT-2000, side to side difference on KT-2000, pivot shift grade II or III, anterior drawer test grade II or III, and Lachman test grade II or III | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed |
BPTB - allograft | None | 34 | 22 | 12 | 31.8 ± 6.9 | ||||||
BPTB - autograft | None | 33 | 24 | 9 | 29.7 ± 7.2 | No significant difference on overall IKDC, range of motion, Harner's vertical jump test, Daniel’s one-leg hip test, subjective IKDC, Cincinnati knee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score | |||||
Sun et al[24] | 2011 | Prospective, randomized | Hamstring - allograft | 2.5 Mrad | 31/37 | 24 | 7 | 30.3 ± 7.9 | 42.2 mo (11% lost to follow-up) | Significant difference between irradiated allograft and autograft with greater laxity on KT-2000, side to side difference on KT-2000, pivot shift grade II or III, anterior drawer test grade II or III, and Lachman test grade II or III | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed |
Hamstring - autograft | None | 36/38 | 28 | 8 | 30.9 ± 8.7 | No significant difference on overall IKDC, range of motion, Harner's vertical jump test, Daniel's one-leg hip test, subjective IKDC, Cincinnati knee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score | |||||
Sun et al[25] | 2012 | Prospective, randomized | Hamstring - allograft | 2.5 Mrad | 31/38 | 24 | 7 | 30.3 ± 7.9 | 42.5 mo (9.1% lost to follow-up) | Significant difference between irradiated allograft and non-irradiated allograft with greater laxity on KT-2000, side to side difference on KT-2000, pivot shift grade II or III, anterior drawer test grade II or III, and Lachman test grade II or III | No mention of temperature when irradiation performed |
Hamstring - allograft | None | 38/39 | 31 | 7 | 31.7 ± 7.8 | No significant difference on overall IKDC, range of motion, Harner's vertical jump test, Daniel's one-leg hip test, subjective IKDC, Cincinnati knee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score |
- Citation: Dashe J, Parisien RL, Cusano A, Curry EJ, Bedi A, Li X. Allograft tissue irradiation and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2016; 7(6): 392-400
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i6/392.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.392