Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2016; 7(4): 258-264
Published online Apr 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.258
Published online Apr 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.258
Table 2 Radiographic outcomes
| Arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation | Open reduction and internal fixation | P value | |
| Meticulous grading | |||
| Anatomic (step/gap ≤ 1.0 mm) | 8 (50%) | 8 (27.6%) | 0.539 |
| Good (step/gap = 1.1-2.0 mm) | 4 (25%) | 9 (31.0%) | |
| Fair (step/gap = 2.1-3.0 mm) | 2 (12.5%) | 5 (17.2%) | |
| Poor (step/gap > 3.0 mm) | 2 (12.5%) | 7 (24.1%) | |
| General grading | |||
| Acceptable (step/gap ≤ 2.0 mm) | 12 (75.0%) | 17 (58.6%) | 0.341 |
| Unacceptable (step/gap > 2.0 mm) | 4 (25.0%) | 12 (41.4%) | |
- Citation: Angthong C. Ankle fracture configuration following treatment with and without arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation. World J Orthop 2016; 7(4): 258-264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i4/258.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.258