Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2016; 7(4): 251-257
Published online Apr 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.251
Table 2 Reoperations, revisions and outcome
TypeFixationOperation performedIndicationSurvival(mo)GenderAge(yr)ASABMIkg/m2OKSAKSSO/S
RevisionCTKP PS 5/5/15 mmMalrotation tibial component16Male50130.0--
RedoCLNettoyage PE 5 to 8Subluxation PE19Male50130.048100/100
RevisionCTKP elsewhereAseptic loosening tibial component20Female78127.2--
RedoCNettoyage PE 5 to 6PE luxation 90 degrees21Male60232.846100/100
RedoCLNettoyage PE 5 to 7Impingement21Male55332.43780/90
RedoCLNettoyage PE 4 to 7Impingement21Male64231.74290/100
RedoCNettoyage PE 4 to 6Subluxation PE22Male51228.44895/100
RedoCLPlannedImpingement23Male55226.6--
RedoCLPlannedImpingement26Female62225.8--
RevisionCACS 5/5/12, 5 mmProgression of OA lateral/PF27Male51236.3--