Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport

Table 2 Results of studies using Functional Movement Screen™ score of 14 as a cut point to predict musculoskeletal injuries

Ref.	Sample	Injury definition	Sensitivity	Specificity	+LR	-LR
Kiesel et al[22]	46 male professional American football players	Athletic performance injury requiring injury reserve and time loss of 3 wk	54%	91%	NR	NR
Chorba et al[23]	38 female Division II athletes	Athletic performance injury requiring intervention	58%	74%	2.20	NR
O’Connor et al[24]	874 male Officer candidates	Any injury: Physical training injury requiring intervention	45%	78%	NR	NR
		Overuse injury: Long term repetitive energy exchange with cumulative microtrauma	12%	90%	NR	NR
		Serious injury: Physical training injury requiring removal from training	12%	94%	NR	NR
Butler et al[25]	108 firefight trainees	Physical training injury with time loss of 3 consecutive days	84%	62%	2.20	0.26
Warren et al[26]	195 male and females Division I athletes	Athletic performance injury requiring intervention	54%	46%	NR	NR
Garrison et al[27]	160 male and females Division I athletes	Athletic performance injury requiring intervention, and 24 h missed time or splinting, to continue participation	67%	73%	2.51	0.45
Hotta et al[28]	84 competitive male runners	Physical training injury with time loss of 4 wk	73%	54%	NR	NR
Knapik et al[29]	1045 male and female military cadets	Physical training injury	55%	49%	NR	NR
McGill et al[30]	53 elite police officer	Back injury not due to specific acute incidents	28%	76%	NR	NR
		All injury	42%	47%	NR	NR

LR: Likelihood ratio.