Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2016; 7(11): 758-765
Published online Nov 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.758
Published online Nov 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.758
Table 3 Results of two-factorial ANOVA
Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F | P | Partial eta-square | |
Inner-subject effects | ||||||
Pre- vs post-training (n = 64) | 1.05 | 1 | 1.05 | 1.32 | 0.255 | 0.021 |
Training group (5 Hz vs 1.5 Hz) | 3.86 | 1 | 3.86 | 4.85 | 0.031 | 0.073 |
Within subjects error | 49.32 | 62 | 0.80 | |||
Between subjects effects | ||||||
Constant | 8.91 | 1 | 8.91 | 1.18 | 0.282 | 0.021 |
Training group (5 Hz vs 1.5 Hz) | 0.74 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.01 | 0.931 | 0.000 |
Between subjects error | 608.92 | 62 | 9.82 |
- Citation: Elfering A, Burger C, Schade V, Radlinger L. Stochastic resonance whole body vibration increases perceived muscle relaxation but not cardiovascular activation: A randomized controlled trial. World J Orthop 2016; 7(11): 758-765
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i11/758.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.758