Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2016; 7(1): 61-68
Published online Jan 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61
Table 7 Published level I studies with significant percentage of outliers of > 3˚ deviation between the patient specific matched guides and conventional intramedular and/or extramedular alignment method for hip-knee-ankle angle axis, frontal femoral component, frontal tibial component, flexion/extension of the femur component, lateral tibial component and axial rotation of the femur and/or tibia component controlled with postoperative X-ray (long-leg standing and/or lateral X-rays) and/or computed tomography
Outliers (%) > 3° deviationPSG systemModalityConventionalControlSample sizeSignificant outliers (%)
femur/tibia(PSG/conventional)(PSG/conventional)
Boonen et al[16]SignatureMRIIntraX-ray90/90LFC (49/65)1
Chareancholvanich et al[17]PSIMRIIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT40/40FFC (0/18)1
Chotanaphuti et al[18]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT40/40NA
Hamilton et al[19]TruMatchScout CTIntra/ExtraX-ray26/26LTC (65/50)2
Ng et al[22] [Outliers (%) > 2° deviation]PSIMRIIntraCT51/27FTC (27/67)2, Femoral rotation (16/67)2, Tibial rotation (22/95)2
Pfitzner et al[24]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT(30/30)/30HKA (30/7/43)2
VisionaireMRI + X-rayFTC (13/3/23)1
Femoral rotation (1/13 /50)1
Victor et al[25]SignatureMRI, CTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT(16/16/16/16)/64  FTC (15/3)1
TruMatchMRI + X-rayLTC (21/3)2
VisionaireMRIHKA (6/25/45/19)1, 3
PSILFC (62/20/20/56)2, 3
Kotela et al[26]SignatureCTIntra/ExtraX-ray49/46FTC (39/20)1
Woolson et al[27]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraCT22/26LTC (32/8)1
Current studySignatureMRIIntraX-ray(15/13/14/15)/60FFC (022)2
TruMatchCTLFC (16/67)2
VisionaireMRI + X-rayLTC (16/42)1
PSIMRI