Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 290-297
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290
Table 3 Currently available patient-specific instrumentation platforms (data adapted from Ast et al[6])
| Manufacturer | Product | Imaging | Type of guide | Launched |
| Biomet | Signature-vanguard | CT or MRI | Pinning | MRI-2007 CT-2010 |
| DePuy | Trumatch | CT | Cutting | 2009 |
| Smith and nephew | Visionaire | MRI | Pinning | 2008 |
| Wright medical | Prophecy | CT or MRI | Pinning | 2009 |
| Zimmer | PSI | MRI | Pinning | 2009 |
| Conformis | Conformis iTotal | CT | Cutting | 2011 |
| Medacta | My knee | CT | Cutting | 2009 |
-
Citation: Stirling P, Valsalan Mannambeth R, Soler A, Batta V, Malhotra RK, Kalairajah Y. Computerised tomography
vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 290-297 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/290.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290