Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 244-251
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244
Post-op outcome | Adjusted CS (%) | No. of anatomic TSRs n = 46 | % anatomic TSRs using adjusted CS | No. of inverse TSRs n = 58 | % inverse TSRs using adjusted CS |
Unsatisfactory outcome | < 40 | 10 | 22 | 9 | 16 |
Fair outcome | 40-49 | 9 | 20 | 5 | 9 |
Good outcome | 50-69 | 9 | 20 | 14 | 24 |
Very good outcome | 70-79 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
Excellent outcome | ≥ 80 | 15 | 33 | 25 | 43 |
Totals | 46 | 100 | 58 | 100 |
- Citation: Booker S, Alfahad N, Scott M, Gooding B, Wallace WA. Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 244-251
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244