Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2015; 6(11): 944-953
Published online Dec 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.944
Published online Dec 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.944
Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | |
Standard radiography | 0.59 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
Heel-rise radiography | 0.70 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.90 |
Computed tomography | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
Magnetic resonance imaging | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.99 |
- Citation: Bergen CJV, Gerards RM, Opdam KT, Terra MP, Kerkhoffs GM. Diagnosing, planning and evaluating osteochondral ankle defects with imaging modalities. World J Orthop 2015; 6(11): 944-953
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i11/944.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.944