Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2015; 6(1): 150-155
Published online Jan 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.150
Published online Jan 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.150
Table 2 Comparison of active follow-up in the office and non-compliant with office follow-up visits by operative procedure n (%)
Groups | MOMHR | Primary BKA | Primary THA | Primary TKA | Primary UKA | Revision THA | Revision TKA | Total |
OFU | 94 (21) | 12 (3) | 148 (34) | 130 (29) | 23 (5) | 28 (6) | 9 (2) | 444 (100) |
NFU | 36 (25) | 2 (1) | 52 (36) | 31 (22) | 10 (7) | 9 (6) | 4 (3) | 144 (100) |
Total | 130 | 14 | 200 | 161 | 33 | 37 | 13 | 588 |
- Citation: Choi JK, Geller JA, Jr DAP, Wang W, Macaulay W. How are those “lost to follow-up” patients really doing? A compliance comparison in arthroplasty patients. World J Orthop 2015; 6(1): 150-155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i1/150.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.150