Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2014; 5(5): 614-622
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.614
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.614
Figure 6 Newer stem designs with modular configuration have been associated with lower rates of subsidence and improved restoration of limb length and femoral offset.
A: Anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the left hip showing extensive bone loss of the proximal metaphyseal bone with significant diaphyseal bone loss (Paparosky type IIIB) secondary to periprosthetic hip infection. A antibiotic cement spacer was implanted after irrigation and debridement during the first stage of a two-stage exchange arthroplasty; B: AP radiograph of the same hip after the second stage using a distal fixation taper fluted stem.
- Citation: Sakellariou VI, Babis GC. Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 614-622
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i5/614.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.614