Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2014; 5(5): 591-596
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
Table 2 Thirteen year New Zealand Joint Registry reasons for revision for loosening within 90 d n (%)
| Fixation/n | Loose cup | Loose stem | Unstable | Deep infection | Pain | Femoral fracture |
| Cemented/77 | 6 (7.8) | 3 (3.9) | 58 (75.3) | 9 (11.7) | 9 (2.6) | 3 (3.9) |
| Hybrid/189 | 31 (16.4) | 7 (3.7) | 113 (59.8) | 26 (13.8) | 5 (2.6) | 9 (4.8) |
| Reverse hybrid/2 | 0 | 1 (50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (50) |
| Uncemented/270 | 23 (8.5) | 23 (8.5) | 108 (40) | 26 (9.6) | 5 (1.9) | 81 (30) |
- Citation: Wyatt M, Hooper G, Frampton C, Rothwell A. Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 591-596
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i5/591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591