Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2014; 5(3): 379-385
Published online Jul 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.379
Published online Jul 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.379
Table 2 Comparison of surgical, acute care, rehabilitation and follow-up between implant treatment groups
Surgical implant | P-value | ||||||
LISS(n = 19) | LISS-R(n = 11) | LISS-N(n = 8) | Alternative(n = 8) | LISS vs alternative | LISS-R vs LISS-N | LISS-R vs LISS-N vs alternative | |
Surgery within first 48 h | 11 (58%) | 6 (55%) | 5 (63%) | 6 (75%) | 0.6655 | 1.0000 | 0.8773 |
Operation blood loss (mL) | 521.1 (296.4) | 490.9 (328.5) | 562.5 (261.5) | 806.3 (925.2) | 0.2304 | 0.6173 | 0.4761 |
Operation time (min) | 118.4 (24.6) | 121.0 (30.0) | 114.8 (16.7) | 158.5 (42.8) | 0.0048 | 0.5988 | 0.0187 |
Length of acute hospital stay (d) | 11.7 (6.9) | 9.4 (4.6) | 14.9 (8.5) | 8.9 (6.6) | 0.3378 | 0.0859 | 0.1357 |
No rehabilitation | 11 (58%) | 4 (36%) | 7 (88%) | 7 (88%) | 0.2011 | 0.0587 | 0.0308 |
Rehabilitation less than 14 d | 4 (21%) | 4 (36%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.28551 | 0.10321 | 0.02681 |
- Citation: Batchelor E, Heal C, Haladyn JK, Drobetz H. Treatment of distal femur fractures in a regional Australian hospital. World J Orthop 2014; 5(3): 379-385
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i3/379.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.379