Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2014; 5(2): 89-93
Published online Apr 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.89
Published online Apr 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.89
Design type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Case series | Suitable for rare diseases or new treatments | No comparison group |
Retrospective nature | ||
Case control | Small sample size | Presence of confounding |
Short duration | Retrospective nature | |
Cohort studies | Evaluates risk factors | Presence of confounding |
Compares two treatments | ||
May be prospective | ||
Randomized controlled trials | Prospective in nature | Limited generalizability |
Reduce confounding and bias | Potential for low recruitment and high crossover | |
High cost and administrative oversight | ||
Systematic review | Provides summation of available literature | Dependent on quality of individual studies |
- Citation: Oppenlander ME, Maulucci CM, Ghobrial GM, Harrop JS. Research in spinal surgery: Evaluation and practice of evidence-based medicine. World J Orthop 2014; 5(2): 89-93
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i2/89.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.89