Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2024; 15(6): 570-577
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.570
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.570
Follow-up time point | TRAP group, n = 20 | Osteotomy group, n = 20 | ||||
Arc of motion | DASH | MEPS | Arc of motion | DASH | MEPS | |
6 wk | 57.6 ± 3.4 | 53.6 ± 3.9 | 53.3 ± 2.9 | 69.3 ± 3.3 | 46.8 ± 4.1 | 62.7 ± 2.1 |
3 months | 79.7 ± 4.1 | 36.5 ± 4.2 | 67.5 ± 2.7 | 87.7 ± 3.9 | 35.5 ± 3.7 | 70.1 ± 2.8 |
6 months | 99.7 ± 3.7 | 25.4 ± 4.9 | 81.2 ± 3.3 | 101.3 ± 4.9 | 23.9 ± 3.8 | 83.1 ± 3.5 |
1 yr | 107.0 ± 3.5 | 18.3 ± 4.7 | 84.2 ± 2.9 | 106.2 ± 3.8 | 15.7 ± 3.9 | 86.2 ± 3.1 |
- Citation: Ailani R, Bhuyan SK, Prasad BK, Kumar A, Dawani N. Clinical outcomes of triceps reflecting anconeus pedicle and olecranon osteotomy approach for distal humerus intercondylar fractures. World J Orthop 2024; 15(6): 570-577
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i6/570.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.570