Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2024; 15(3): 293-301
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.293
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.293
Ref. | Methods | Participants | Mean age (SD) | Measured outcomes | Follow-up time | ||
PL | SL | PL | SL | ||||
Abdeldayem et al[24], 2018 | Prospective randomized comparison | 44 | 42 | 64, NA | 64, NA | Knee society score, knee function score, radiolucent lines | 12 months |
Clarius et al[30], 2009 | Prospective non-randomized comparison | 54 | 46 | 63, NA | 68, NA | Knee society score, knee function score, Oxford knee score, radiolucent lines | 22 months |
Mellema et al[28], 2011 | Retrospective comparison | 39 | 48 | 62; 9 | 55; 10 | Rate of heterotopic ossification | 14 months |
Sneath et al[31], 2001 | Prospective randomized comparison | 48 | 46 | 71, NA | 73, NA | Rate of heterotopic ossification | 12 months |
- Citation: Daher M, Haykal G, Aoun M, Moussallem M, Ghoul A, Tarchichi J, Sebaaly A. Pulsed lavage in joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2024; 15(3): 293-301
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i3/293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.293