Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2024; 15(3): 266-284
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.266
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.266
Comparison | Number of studies | Within-study bias | Reporting bias | Indirectness | Imprecision | Heterogeneity | Incoherence | Confidence rating | Reasons for downgrading |
MFx-I: MFx-II | 7 | Some concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Major concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Moderate | Imprecision in results |
MFx-I: MFx -III | 1 | Some concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Major concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Moderate | Imprecision in results |
MFx-II: MFx -III | 1 | Some concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Major concerns | Some concerns | No concerns | Moderate | Imprecision in results |
- Citation: Muthu S, Viswanathan VK, Sakthivel M, Thabrez M. Does progress in microfracture techniques necessarily translate into clinical effectiveness? World J Orthop 2024; 15(3): 266-284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i3/266.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.266