Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2024; 15(3): 215-229
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.215
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.215
Pros | Cons |
Bioabsorbable and osteoconductive[1,20]; Higher stability than existing polymers[21,22]; Similar stiffness to bone – less stress shielding[4]; Good biocompatibility[1-4]; Minimal artefacts on MRI and CT[23] | Production of hydrogen gas creates peri-implant radiolucencies[3]; Risk of osteolysis[3,24]; Unproven long term track record |
- Citation: Fang C, Premchand AXR, Park DH, Toon DH. Peri-articular elbow fracture fixations with magnesium implants and a review of current literature: A case series. World J Orthop 2024; 15(3): 215-229
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i3/215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.215