Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2024; 15(3): 215-229
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.215
Table 3 Magnesium implants pros & cons
Pros
Cons
Bioabsorbable and osteoconductive[1,20]; Higher stability than existing polymers[21,22]; Similar stiffness to bone – less stress shielding[4]; Good biocompatibility[1-4]; Minimal artefacts on MRI and CT[23]Production of hydrogen gas creates peri-implant radiolucencies[3]; Risk of osteolysis[3,24]; Unproven long term track record