Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2024; 15(1): 22-29
Published online Jan 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i1.22
Published online Jan 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i1.22
DAA (n = 105) | PL (n = 154) | P value | |
Fractures | 0.87 | ||
Perioperative fracture | 2 (1.9) | 4 (2.6) | |
Postoperative fracture | 2 (1.9) | 4 (2.6) | |
Infection | 0.96 | ||
Superficial | 1 (1.0) | 2 (1.3) | |
Deep (implant retained) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (0.6) | |
Deep (implant changed) | 2 (1.9) | 2 (1.3) | |
Overall Dislocations | 0 | 14 (9.1) | 0.0015 |
Revision surgery for recurrent dislocation | 0 | 8 (5.2) | 0.018 |
Total hips operated (n) vs dislocated hips (Dis) | |||
n/Dis | 105/0 | 154/14 (9.1) | |
Senior surgeon | |||
n/Dis | 60/0 | 38/3 (7.9) | |
Resident surgeon | |||
n/Dis | 32/0 | 77/6 (7.8) | |
Trainee | |||
n/Dis | 13/0 | 39/5 (12.8) |
- Citation: Charles T, Bloemers N, Kapanci B, Jayankura M. Complication rates after direct anterior vs posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly individuals with femoral neck fractures. World J Orthop 2024; 15(1): 22-29
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i1/22.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i1.22