Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2023; 14(9): 682-689
Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i9.682
Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i9.682
Figure 3 Bone tissue formation (Bone-implant-contact%; Bone marrow%) around two types of titanium implants.
3D-printed and plasma-coated titanium implants 45 d (n = 10) and 90 d (n = 10) after implantation in the distal metaphysis of the femur of rats. Data are presented as mean ± SD. A: Bone-implant contact (Bone-implant-contact%) is significantly higher at day 90 for the implant with 3D-printed titanium; B: Bone marrow% is significantly lower at day 90 for the implant with 3D-printed titanium. NS: Not significant; aP < 0.05.
- Citation: Bondarenko S, Filipenko V, Ashukina N, Maltseva V, Ivanov G, Lazarenko I, Sereda D, Schwarzkopf R. Comparative study in vivo of the osseointegration of 3D-printed and plasma-coated titanium implants. World J Orthop 2023; 14(9): 682-689
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i9/682.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i9.682