Cemented versus uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.630

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2536)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

WORD

HTML

1460

Figures (1-2)

178

Tables (1-8)

220

Sum=1946

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

375

Sum=474

Aug 18, 2023 (publication date) through Nov 17, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (7)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2023; 14(8): 630-640
Published online Aug 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.630

Table 6 Study characteristics of the cemented stem

Ref.	Country	Journal	Study type	Canters	Level of evidence	Total number	Gender male/female	Age	Follow up in years (SD)
Te Stroet et al[14], 2014	Netherlands	BJJ	ROS	Single centre	3	37	17/20	76 (39- 93)	9 (4)
Randhawa et al[15], 2009	United Kingdom	JOT	ROS	Single centre	3	57	27/30	73 (37-94)	3.25 (3)
Stigbrand and Ullmark, 2017	Sweden	JOA	ROS	Single centre	3	69	40/29	69	7 (3.2)
Pallaver et al[19], 2018	Switzerland	AOTS	ROS	Single	3	178	126/52	68.4 (36-90)	9.3 (5.2)
Davis et al[17], 2003	United States	JBJS	ROS	Single	3	48	27/21	67 (47-82)	6.5 (2)
Turner et al[18], 1987	United States	JOA	ROS	Single	3	165	81/84	62.1 (22-92)	6.7 (1.5)

ROS: Retrospective observational study; BJJ: The Bone & Joint Journal; MSM: Medical Science Monitor; JOT: Journal of Orthopaedics & Traumatology; JOA: Journal of Arthroplasty; AOTS: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery; JBJS: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Citation: Elbardesy H, Anazor F, Mirza M, Aly M, Maatough A. Cemented versus uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2023; 14(8): 630-640
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i8/630.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.630