Cemented versus uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 5 Patients demographic for the study involved uncemented stem

Ref.	Gender male/female	Age in years (SD)	Follow up in years (SD)
Mahoney et al[20], 2010	18/22	64 (30.5)	10.2 (2.8)
Zhao et al[21], 2009	12/8	65 (9.5)	3 (1.1)
Hasegawa et al[22], 2021	12/33	62.6 (26)	13.8 (2.2)
Zheng et al[23], 2021	16/18	63.9 (11.7)	9.1 (2.5)
Wallace et al[24], 2020	19/36	66.4 (9.3)	13.2 (2.17)
Zang et al[25], 2019	15/25	62 (19.5)	15.7 (7.1)
Herry et al[26], 2019	55/61	68 (12)	10 (3)
Shen et al[27], 2014	21/13	65 (13.5)	6 (1.5)
Wang et al[28], 2020	33/42	62.6 (16.5)	12.6 (2)
Singh et al[34], 2013	42/6	54.7 (15.3)	14 (4.5)
Oetgen et al[29], 2008	18/10	59 (12)	5.5 (1.5)
Sotereanos et al[36], 2006	9/7	66 (17.5)	7.4 (6.5)
Philippot et al[35], 2009	10/33	54 (17.5)	5.3 (1.5)
Thorey et al[30], 2008	33/46	72.4 (28.5)	4 (2)
Malkani et al[31], 1996	40/ 34	67.1 (10.1)	6.8 (3.9)
Mulliken et al[32], 1996	31/32	62 (12)	3 (1)
Meding et al[33], 1994	17/7	63.8 (29)	3.6 (2)

SD: Standard deviation.