Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2023; 14(8): 589-597
Published online Aug 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.589
Table 2 Main characteristics and results of the recent literature on the topic vancomycin powder
Ref.
Type of study
No. of studies
No. of cases (control/intervention)
PJI Rate/RR (control vs intervention)
SSI/Aseptic wound complications (control vs intervention)
Authors’ conclusions
Martin et al[36], 2022Systematic review and meta-analysis7/7144724/8029RR 0.39 (95%CI 0.27-0.56, P < 0.001)6.48% vs 3.79%VP ± PI lavage reduced PJI rate in primary and revision THA/TKA. Associated with reduced aseptic wound complications
Liao et al[35], 2022Systematic review and meta-analysis147720/1292RR 0.41 (95%CI 0.29-0.58, P < 0.001)-VP recommended in primary TKA
Movassaghi et al[30], 2022Systematic review and meta-analysis163731/171641.65% vs 0.87% (P < 0.05)-Local VP may reduce the risk of PJI in primary and revision TJA
Wong et al[31], 2021Systematic review96255/3371-No differenceRecommend the surgeons not to use VP in routine THA and TKA
Peng et al[32], 2021Systematic review and meta-analysis94512/2354RR 0.37 (95%CI 0.23- 0.60, P < 0.001)RR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.27-0.61 (P < 0.001)Local VP could significantly decrease the rate of SSI and PJI in primary TJA
Saidahmed et al[33], 2021Systematic review and meta-analysis93714/19853.5% vs 1.6%, RR 0.53 (95%CI 0.35-0.79, P = 0.002, I2 = 0.0%)No difference 1.6% vs 0.7%, RR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.17-2.12, (P = 0.43, I2 = 0.0%)Local antibiotic application results in a moderate reduction in deep infection rates in primary TJA, with no significant impact on SSI rate
Xu et al[34], 2020Systematic review and meta-analysis94607/24972.75% vs 1.20% (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.28-0.69, I2 = 0.0%)No difference 1.60% vs 0.67% (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.12, I2 = 0.0%)VP used in primary hip and knee arthroplasty may reduce the incidence of PJI but it may increase the risk of aseptic wound complications