Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2023; 14(7): 572-581
Published online Jul 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i7.572
Published online Jul 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i7.572
Group A | Group B | t value | P value | Significance | |
n = 20 | n = 20 | ||||
Age in yr | 31.20 ± 4.15 | 29.10 ± 5.12 | 1.43 | 0.16 | NS |
Weight | 72.55 ± 7.65 | 73.35 ± 14.23 | -0.22 | 0.83 | NS |
Height | 168.40 ± 5.90 | 169.05 ± 9.83 | -0.25 | 0.80 | NS |
BMI in kg/m2 | 25.50 ± 2.25 | 24.80 ± 2.29 | 0.98 | 0.34 | NS |
Sex distribution | 20% male and 80% female | 40% male and 60% female | χ2 = 1.91 | 0.17 | NS |
- Citation: Shamseldeen NE, Hegazy MMA, Fayaz NA, Mahmoud NF. Instrumented assisted soft tissue mobilization vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. World J Orthop 2023; 14(7): 572-581
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i7/572.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i7.572