Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2023; 14(6): 458-470
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.458
Table 1 Included articles and article attributes
Ref.
Country of conduction
Study design
Studied TKA types
Type of economic analysis
Attard et al[44], 2019United KingdomRCTPSI TKA vs CI TKA vs Single use inserts for TKAFinancial study
Barrack et al[31], 2012United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Cotter et al[42], 2022United StatesRetrospectiveCI TKA vs other1 TKAFinancial study
Dakin et al[43], 2012United KingdomRetrospective RCT-analysisCI TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Dakin et al[33], 2020United KingdomRetrospectiveCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
DeHaan et al[49], 2014United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CIFinancial study
Elmallah et al[29], 2017United StatesRetrospective comparative cohortCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
Goldberg et al[30], 2019United StatesRetrospectiveCI TKA vs other TKAFinancial decision model
Jenkins et al[32], 2013United KingdomProspectiveCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
Konopka et al[37], 2018United StatesRetrospectiveCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
Krummenauer et al[35], 2009GermanyProspectiveCI TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Lionberger et al[27], 2014United StatesRCTPSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Losina et al[46], 2009United StatesRetrospective population analysisCI TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Moerenhout et al[36], 2021SwitzerlandCase control, retrospective chartPSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Mont et al[48], 2012United StatesProspective controlled trialCI TKA vs other TKAFinancial study
Navarro Espigares and Hernández Torres[47], 2008SpainProspective cohortCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
Nunley et al[11], 2012United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Peersman et al[53], 2014BelgiumRetrospectiveCI TKA vs other TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Räsänen et al[45], 2007FinlandProspectiveCI TKA vs Total hip arthroplastyCost-effectiveness analysis
Rorabeck and Murray[50], 1996CanadaRetrospectiveCI TKAFinancial study
Schilling et al[28], 2017AustraliaRetrospectiveCI TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Siegel et al[40], 2015United StatesRetrospectiveCI TKA vs other TKAFinancial study
Slover et al[54], 2006United StatesTheoretical cohortCI TKA vs other TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Slover et al[12], 2012United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial decision model
Stan et al[34], 2015RomaniaRetrospectiveCI TKA vs other TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Teeter et al[38], 2019CanadaRCTPSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Thienpont et al[41], 2015BelgiumRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Thomas et al[56], 2022United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Tibesku et al[51], 2013GermanyRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Waimann et al[39], 2014United StatesProspectiveCI TKACost-effectiveness analysis
Watters et al[52], 2011United StatesRetrospectivePSI TKA vs CI TKAFinancial study
Xie et al[55], 2010SingaporeNon-randomized prospective observational cohortCI TKA vs other TKACost-effectiveness analysis
1Other type of total Knee arthroplasty (TKA) includes robot-assisted, unicondylar or single-use TKA.
PSI: Patient specific instrumentation; CI: Conventional instrumentation; TKA: Total knee arthroplasty; RCT: Randomised controlled trial.