Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2023; 14(12): 868-877
Published online Dec 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.868
Published online Dec 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.868
Figure 4 Comparative size of posterior malleolus on X-rays and axial computed tomography scan according to the Haraguchi classification.
A: The percent size of the posterior malleolus measured in profile X-ray images according to Haraguchi classification; B: The percent size of the posterior malleolus measured in axial tomography images according to the Haraguchi classification. A statistically significant difference was found only when compared to Haraguchi 3. No difference was found between Haraguchi 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). PMXR: Posterior malleolus size in profile X-ray images; AXCT: Axial computed tomography slice of the posterior malleolus.
- Citation: De Marchi Neto N, Nesello PFT, Bergamasco JM, Costa MT, Christian RW, Severino NR. Importance of computed tomography in posterior malleolar fractures: Added information to preoperative X-ray studies. World J Orthop 2023; 14(12): 868-877
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i12/868.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.868