Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2023; 14(11): 813-826
Published online Nov 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i11.813
Published online Nov 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i11.813
Ref. | Country | Journal | Level of evidence, study type | Groups | No. of shoulder in group | Male:female sex | Age, yr | Follow-up, mo | Outcomes |
Barth et al[37], 2020 | France | Am J Sports Med | 3, retrospective study | DR vs TOE with absorbable patch reinforcement vs SCR with LHBT autograft | 28 vs 30 vs 24 | 15:13 vs 19:11 vs 16:8 | 63 ± 9 (48-83) vs 59 ± 7.6 (45-71) vs 60 ± 7 (47-81) | 25 ± 2 (24-29) vs 27 ± 5 (24-36) vs 25 ± 2 (24-29) | ASES score, VAS score, constant score, range of motion, simple shoulder test, subjective shoulder value, muscle strength, retear rate |
Kocaoglu et al[34], 2020 | Turkey | Orthop J Sports Med | 3, retrospective study | SCR with LHBT autograft vs SCR with a tensor fasciae lata autograft | 14 vs 12 | N/A | 64.6 ± 8.4 vs 62.5 ± 6.5 | 28 vs 32 | ASES score, VAS score, QuickDASH, range of motion, AHD, retear rate |
Rhee et al[33], 2021 | Korea | Arthroscopy | 3, retrospective study | ARCR + BR vs ARCR | 59 vs 52 | 32:27 vs 29:23 | 63.7 ± 6.5 vs 62.8 ± 6.9 | 15.1 ± 3.4 vs 25.1 ± 8.7 | ASES score, VAS score, constant score, UCLA score, range of motion, muscle strength, AHD, retear rate |
Chiang et al[36], 2021 | China (Taiwan) | Arthroscopy | 3, retrospective study | ARCR and SCR with LHBT autograft vs ARCR and tenotomy of LHBT performed at the insertion site | 18 vs 22 | 7:11 vs 6:16 | 62.3 ± 7.5 vs 62.2 ± 6.1 | 26.6 ± 3.9 (24-38) vs 31.9 ± 6.4 (26-45) | ASES score, VAS score, UCLA score, rang of motion, AHD, retear rate |
Kawashima et al[35], 2022 | Japan | Arthroscopy | 3, retrospective study | partial repair vs SCR with LHBT transposition | 10 vs 12 | 6:4 vs 7:5 | 71.9 ± 7.5 vs 67.8 ± 2.0 | 37.2 (24-72) vs 24.8 (24-30) | ASES score, UCLA score, rang of motion, AHD, retear rate |
- Citation: Wan RW, Luo ZW, Yang YM, Zhang HL, Chen JN, Chen SY, Shang XL. Long head of biceps tendon transposition for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2023; 14(11): 813-826
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i11/813.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i11.813