Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Return to sports at a minimum 5-year follow-up

Table 6 Comparing our series with the literature for the Lysholm, Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores

Ref.	N	Years	F-up in yr	RTS	IKDC	Lysholm	Tegner	KT-1000, mm ± SD	KOOS
Battaglia et al[28], 2007	63	31	6.1	42 (66%) same level	G/E 36%; P 17%; F 11%	-	-	< 3	-
Diamantopoulos et al[29], 2008	107	39	6	39 (36%) same level	G/E 57%; P 34%; F 7%	88.5 ± 12.4	6.3 ± 1.8	0.93 ± 1.15	-
Gifstad et al[30], 2013	56	26	7.5	7 (13%) same level	-	80 ± 15	6 ± 4	3.3 ± 2.7	70 ± 21
Shelbourne et al[31], 2014	259	22	7.2	178 (68%) same level	Subjective 76 ± 18.3	-	-	2.3 ± 1.7	-
Ortiz et al, 2022	41	29	5.8	61% same level & 39% lower level	G/E 43%; P 53%; F 4%	89 ± 8	5.6 ± 1.6	3 ± 1.2	-

N: Number of patients; F-up: Follow up; RTS: Return to sport; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; G/E: Good to excellent; P: Poor; F: Fair; SD: Standard deviation; KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.