Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2022; 13(8): 733-743
Published online Aug 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.733
Published online Aug 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.733
Figure 1 In this study, a method for assessing the morphometric parameters of the proximal femur based on the projection values and angle of rotation around the anatomical axis relative to the FSP was developed.
A: Bone No. 9. Triangle ABC comprised the NSA (angle CAB); AC, neck axis; and AB, diaphyseal axis segment (connecting the diameter of the diaphysis to the neck axis); B: Bone No. 9. Angle KLJ was a part of Ward’s triangle, designating the angle of the minimal resistance zone (AMRZ); C: Bone No. 7. The angle, indicating the borders of the AMRZ, was plotted on photos of gross bone sections.
- Citation: Shitova AD, Kovaleva ON, Olsufieva AV, Gadzhimuradova IA, Zubkov DD, Kniazev MO, Zharikova TS, Zharikov YO. Risk modeling of femoral neck fracture based on geometric parameters of the proximal epiphysis. World J Orthop 2022; 13(8): 733-743
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i8/733.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.733