Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2022; 13(8): 744-752
Published online Aug 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.744
Table 1 Epidemiological characteristics of pelvic and acetabular fractures
Variable
Pelvic ring fracture only, n (%)
Pelvic ring & acetabulum fracture, n (%)
Acetabulum fracture only, n (%)
Iliac wing fracture, n (%)
Sacrum body fracture, n (%)
Spinopelvic dissociation, n (%)
All pelvic & acetabular fractures, n (%)
Age, median [inter-quartile range]44 [32, 59]54 [48, 61]46 [37, 65]27 [23, 34]53 [38, 69]59 [39, 72]45 [33, 61]
Gender
Male60 (64)9 (82)39 (89)11 (92)2 (29)5 (71)126 (72)
Female34 (36)2 (18)5 (11)1 (8)5 (71)2 (29)49 (28)
ITU admission
Yes40 (43)6 (55)15 (34)4 (33)3 (43)7 (100)75 (43)
No54 (57)5 (45)29 (66)8 (67)4 (57)0 (0)100 (57)
P&A surgery
Yes35 (37)10 (91)29 (66)1 (8)2 (29)7 (100)84 (48)
No59 (63)1 (9)15 (34)11 (92)5 (71)0 (0)91 (52)
Orthopaedic surgeries
2+12 (13)3 (27)10 (23)1 (8)0 (0)3 (43)29 (17)
125 (27)0 (0)7 (16)3 (25)2 (29)0 (0)37 (21)
None57 (60)8 (73)27 (61)8 (67)5 (71)4 (57)109 (62)
Length of stay, median [inter-quartile range]14 [6, 28]28 [20, 43]10 [5, 26]3 [1, 6]14 [8, 26]23 [16, 65]13 [6, 28]
30-d mortality
Alive87 (93)11 (100)44 (100)11 (92)7 (100)6 (86)166 (95)
Dead7 (7)0 (0)0 (0)1 (8)0 (0)1 (14)9 (5)