Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2022; 13(7): 662-675
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.662
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.662
Study characteristic | n(%) |
Study design | |
Randomised controlled trial | 10 (42) |
Prospective cohort study | 5 (21) |
Retrospective cohort study | 6 (25) |
Matched cohort study | 2 (8) |
Case control study | 1 (4) |
Country of origin | |
France | 6 (25) |
Italy | 4 (17) |
Australia | 2 (8) |
South Korea | 2 (8) |
United States | 1 (4) |
Kuwait | 2 (8) |
Turkey | 1 (4) |
United Kingdom | 1 (4) |
Brazil | 1 (4) |
Russia | 1 (4) |
Canada | 1 (4) |
Denmark | 1 (4) |
Algeria | 1 (4) |
Year published | |
2006 | 1 (4) |
2012 | 1 (4) |
2013 | 1 (4) |
2014 | 2 (8) |
2016 | 1 (4) |
2017 | 2 (8) |
2018 | 1 (8) |
2019 | 4 (17) |
2020 | 4 (17) |
2021 | 7 (29) |
Number of patients | |
< 50 | 2 (8) |
50-100 | 10 (42) |
100-250 | 8 (33) |
250-500 | 2 (8) |
> 500 | 2 (8) |
Mean follow-up time | |
1-12 mo | 2 (8) |
13 -24 mo | 6 (25) |
25-36 mo | 4 (17) |
37-60 mo | 7 (29) |
61-120 mo | 4 (17) |
> 120 mo | 1 (4) |
Type of AEAP | |
LET | 13 (54) |
ALLR | 11 (46) |
- Citation: Agarwal N, Monketh J, Volpin A. Clinical and mechanical outcomes in isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction. World J Orthop 2022; 13(7): 662-675
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i7/662.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.662