Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 307-328
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.307
Table 3 Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence profile: Enhanced recovery pathways compared to regular pathways for hip and knee arthroplasty
Quality assessment
No. of patients
Effect
QualityImportance
No. of studies
Design
Risk of bias
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Other considerations
(S)AE
Control
Relative (95%CI)
Absolute
Functional recovery (follow-up 24 mo)
12Randomised trialsNo serious risk of biasSerious1No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionNone0/2289 (0%)0/1802 (0%)Not pooledNot pooledModerateImportant
0%Not pooled
PROMs (follow-up 24 mo; Better indicated by lower values)
15Randomised trialsNo serious risk of biasSerious2No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionNone29662388-Not pooledModerateImportant
LoS (follow-up 24 mo; Better indicated by lower values)
38Randomised trialsNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionNone9974471573895-MD 2.45 lower (3.42 to 1.48 lower)HighImportant
(S)AEs
34Randomised trialsNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencySerious3No serious imprecisionNone2103/18344 (11.5%)83989/540864 (15.5%)RR 0.91 (0.78 to 1.06)14 fewer per 1000 (from 34 fewer to 9 more)ModerateImportant
11.7%11 fewer per 1000 (from 26 fewer to 7 more)
Readmission (follow-up 24 mo)
23Randomised trialsNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious4None273/9846 (2.8%)8360/406167 (2.1%)RR 0.83 (0.65 to 1.07)3 fewer per 1000 (from 7 fewer to 1 more)ModerateImportant
2.7%5 fewer per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 2 more)