Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 297-306
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297
n = 32 | T0 | P value | T1 | P value | T2 | P value |
DASH | 53 (44.5) | 0.344 | 39 (35) | 0.421 | 30 (26) | 0.014 |
CONSTANT | 32 (30) | 0.223 | 48.5 (42) | 0.063 | 65.5 (60) | < 0.001 |
GAD-7 | 6 (5) | 0.827 | 5 (3.3) | 0.548 | 3 (2) | 0.002 |
CSS | 6 (5) | 0.481 | 5 (3) | 0.090 | 3 (2) | 0.001 |
- Citation: Maccagnano G, Solarino G, Pesce V, Vicenti G, Coviello M, Nappi VS, Giannico OV, Notarnicola A, Moretti B. Plate vs reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: The psychological health influence the choice of device? . World J Orthop 2022; 13(3): 297-306
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i3/297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297