Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 278-288
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.278
Table 1 Demographic, clinical and outcome data of subgroup A patients treated with a combined technology Masquelet induced membrane technique + Ilizarov bone transport
Patient
Age (yr), Gender
Mechanism of injury/Туре the fracture
Disease duration (yr)
Type (number) of previous surgeries
Type of nonunion/Infection
Shortening/Bone defect (cm)
Joint Function before surgery
Regenerate/nonunion consolidation completeness
Nonunion consolidation (mo)
Postoperative complication (Paley classification)
Follow-up (mo)
Residual limb length discrepancy (cm)
Further surgery
PTD-151, FMVA, OF1EF (1)TW; Delayed wound healing3/3Knee and ankle stiffness+/+11 Pin-tract infection Regenerate deformity; Deep vein thrombosis172 -
PTD-250, MMVA, OF4 Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection3/5Ankle ankyloses+/+10 Regenerate deformity245 Rejected further surgery
PTD-348, MIF, OF3Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection0/3Ankle stiffness+/+7 Pin-tract infection12--
PTD-418, MIF, OF3Plate (2); EF (2)HN; History of infection6/3Ankle ankyloses+/+11 Knee joint stiffness 366 3-cm lengthening
PTD-521, MIF; OF1EF (2)HN0/4Full function+/+5 Regenerate deformity24--
PTD-639, MCT; CF12Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection1/3Ankle stiffness+/+7 Pin-tract infection12--
PTD-743, MCT2Plate (1)HN; History of infection0/4Ankle stiffness+/+8- n/a -N/A