Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2022; 13(2): 131-138
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.131
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.131
Table 2 Mechanism of injury
| Factor | Total sample (n = 42) | Oblique (n = 17) | Parallel (n = 25) | P value |
| Sports | 26 (61.9) | 11 (64.7) | 15 (60.0) | 1.00 |
| Skating | 12 (28.6) | 7 (41.2) | 5 (20.0) | 0.17 |
| Contact | 3 (7.1) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (8.0) | 1.00 |
| Non-contact | 24 (57.1) | 10 (58.8) | 14 (56.6) | 0.86 |
| Motor vehicle collision | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Fall | 10 (23.8) | 3 (17.6) | 7 (28.0) | 0.49 |
- Citation: Heldt B, Roepe I, Guo R, Attia E, Inneh I, Shenava V, Kushare I. All-epiphyseal versus trans-epiphyseal screw fixation for tillaux fractures: Does it matter? World J Orthop 2022; 13(2): 131-138
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i2/131.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.131