Patient-reported dissatisfaction following second side in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Table 2 MINORS assessment

Ref.	A clearly stated aim	Inclusion of consecutive patients		Prospective collection of data	Endpoint appropriate to the aim of the study			Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint	Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study	Loss of follow-up less than 5%	Prospective calculation of the study size	Total
Suzangar et al[4], 2019	2		2	2		1	N/A		2	2	1	12
Clement et al[6], 2019	2		2	2		2	N/A		2	2	1	13
Abram et al[5], 2016	2		1	2		2	N/A		2	2	2	13
Scott et al[9], 2014	2		2	2		1	N/A		2	2	1	12
Tucker et al[10], 2021	2		2	2		2	N/A		2	2	1	13

The items are scored 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate) or 2 (reported and adequate). The global ideal score is 16 for non-comparative studies. N/A: Not applicable.