Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2022; 13(1): 78-86
Published online Jan 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.78
Published online Jan 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.78
Table 3 Patient reported outcome
| Activity | Intervention | Follow-up | Difference (P value) |
| Willing to return, n (%) | 24 (100%) | NA | NA |
| NRS of pain (0–10) | |||
| During procedure (median, IQR) | 1 (0–2) | NA | NA |
| In rest (past 2 wk) (median, IQR) | 4 (2–7) | 3 (1–5) | < 0.01 |
| Walking (past 2 wk) (median, IQR) | 8 (6–9) | 7 (4–8) | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Stornebrink T, Stufkens SAS, Mercer NP, Kennedy JG, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Can bedside needle arthroscopy of the ankle be an accurate option for intra-articular delivery of injectable agents? World J Orthop 2022; 13(1): 78-86
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i1/78.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.78