Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2021; 12(3): 152-168
Published online Mar 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.152
Table 4 Pain and function responses compared between the continued demand group, defer group and receptive group1
Current function in comparison to before TJA postponement
Continued demand group, n (%)
Defer group, n (%)
Receptive group, n (%)
P value
Functionality due to joint pain0.043
Much less15 (15.31)0 (0)9 (14.06)
Less59 (60.20)10 (50)30 (46.88)
Same19 (19.39)6 (30)24 (37.5)
More2 (2.04)3 (15)0 (0)
Much more3 (3.06)1 (5)1 (1.56)
Walking distance0.118
Much less21 (21.21)2 (10)7 (10.94)
Less29 (29.29)4 (20)25 (39.06)
Same46 (46.46)11 (55)31 (48.44)
More2 (2.02)3 (15)1 (1.56)
Much more1 (1.01)0 (0)0 (0)
Sitting0.518
Much less12 (12.12)2 (11.11)4 (6.25)
Less29 (29.29)4 (22.22)23 (35.94)
Same53 (53.54)11 (61.11)37 (57.81)
More5 (5.05)1 (5.56)0 (0)
Sleep0.643
Much less13 (13.13)3 (15)9 (14.06)
Less15 (15.15)4 (20)6 (9.38)
Same50 (50.51)10 (50)43 (67.19)
More14 (14.14)1 (5)5 (7.81)
Much more7 (7.07)2 (10)1 (1.56)
Current pain in comparison to before TJA postponementContinued demand group, n (%)Defer group, n (%)Receptive group, n (%)P value
Joint pain0.035
Decreased10 (10.10)3 (16.67)10 (15.62)
Same29 (29.29)9 (50)20 (31.25)
Increased60 (60.61)6 (33.33)34 (53.12)
Access to pain medication0.792
No19511
Yes51930
Need for pain medication0.068
Much less5 (5.26)2 (10.53)1 (1.67)
Less7 (7.37)4 (21.05)1 (1.67)
Same34 (35.79)9 (47.37)31 (51.67)
More26 (27.37)3 (15.79)17 (28.33)
Much more23 (24.21)1 (5.26)10 (16.67)
NRS pain score, mean (± SD)Continued demand groupDefer groupReceptive groupP value
7.68 ± 2.145.9 ± 3.27.24 ± 1.8< 0.000