Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2021; 12(3): 140-151
Published online Mar 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.140
Published online Mar 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.140
Table 5 Accuracy of mechanical axis deviation correction
| Accuracy | Plate and screw | External fixator | P value | ||||||
| T | N | O | Total | N | O | T vs T | N vs N | O vs O | |
| Mean (range) | Mean (range) | Mean (range) | Mean (range) | Mean (range) | Mean (range) | ||||
| Accuracy (%) | 96.1 (60 to 100) | 94.8 (60 to 100) | 97.7 (87 to 100) | 98.2 (79 to 100) | 98.2 (82 to 100) | 98.2 (79 to 100) | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.82 |
- Citation: Ghasemi SA, Zhang DT, Fragomen A, Rozbruch SR. Proximal tibial osteotomy for genu varum: Radiological evaluation of deformity correction with a plate vs external fixator. World J Orthop 2021; 12(3): 140-151
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i3/140.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.140