Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2021; 12(2): 69-81
Published online Feb 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.69
Published online Feb 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.69
n | FJS first assessment | FJS second assessment | Difference FJS first-second assessment | P value | SEM | SDC | ES | ||||
m | SD | m | SD | m | 95%CI | ||||||
Function improved | 21 | 46.9 | 34.1 | 56.2 | 34.9 | -9.4 | -13.6–(-5.1) | 0.001 | 0.28 | ||
Function unchanged | 24 | 43.8 | 31.6 | 42.7 | 32.6 | 1.1 | -1.9–4.1 | 0.743 | 3.2 | 8.8 | 0.03 |
Function worsened | 10 | 37.7 | 29.0 | 20.2 | 13.1 | 17.1 | 0.7–33.4 | 0.016 | 0.59 |
- Citation: Freigang V, Weber J, Mueller K, Pfeifer C, Worlicek M, Alt V, Baumann FM. Evaluation of joint awareness after acetabular fracture: Validation of the Forgotten Joint Score according to the COSMIN checklist protocol. World J Orthop 2021; 12(2): 69-81
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i2/69.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.69